One would not expect that a novel rooted in a precolonial African village could offer much instruction for modern America. At first glance, Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe seems distant—geographically, culturally, historically. It tells the story of Umuofia, an Igbo society ordered by tradition, ritual, and communal authority. America, by contrast, imagines itself as modern, pluralistic, and forward-looking.

And yet, it is precisely this distance that sharpens the insight. Achebe’s novel is not only about the collapse of a man, Okonkwo, but about what happens when a society confronts change it cannot absorb—and when leadership emerges that mistakes rigidity for strength.

Okonkwo is, by all outward measures, a model of success. A warrior, a man of titles, a figure of authority, he embodies a particular vision of leadership: strength without compromise, order without ambiguity, masculinity without softness. His life is driven by a singular fear—that he might resemble his father, whom he considers weak. From that fear emerges a personality incapable of concession. To bend is to break; to reconsider is to fail.

There is, in this portrait, an uncomfortable familiarity. The political persona of Donald Trump has been built on a similarly relentless projection of strength—on winning, dominance, and the refusal to acknowledge vulnerability. Compromise is cast as weakness; complexity is flattened into conflict. For many, this posture is precisely the appeal: in a moment of uncertainty, clarity and force can feel like stability.

But Achebe’s warning is that such leadership, while compelling, can become destructive when it collides with a changing world.

In Umuofia, that change arrives in the form of colonialism—missionaries, new laws, a new moral order. In America, the forces are different but no less profound: demographic transformation, shifting cultural norms, evolving definitions of identity and belonging. In both cases, the question is not whether change will occur—it is whether the society, and its leaders, can respond with flexibility rather than fracture.

Okonkwo cannot. He responds to disruption with escalation. Where dialogue is possible, he chooses force. Where adaptation might preserve cohesion, he insists on purity. Even as his community begins to divide—some embracing the new order, others resisting—Okonkwo demands a unified, uncompromising response that no longer reflects the reality around him.

Here the parallel deepens. America today is not a unified polity moving in a single direction; it is a society negotiating its future in real time. Yet the temptation toward absolutism—to insist on restoration rather than reconciliation—remains powerful. Leadership that thrives on division can harden these lines, turning disagreement into rupture.

Achebe’s novel does not end with triumph, but with tragedy. Okonkwo, unable to reconcile himself to a world that has changed without his consent, takes his own life. His death is not only personal; it is symbolic. It marks the moment when a man—and, in many ways, a way of life—proves unable to adapt and therefore cannot endure.

The title itself is the lesson. Things fall apart not simply because of external pressure, but because internal rigidity prevents renewal.

America is not Umuofia, and history does not repeat itself so neatly. But literature has always served as a mirror—not of identical events, but of recurring human patterns. The question Achebe poses is not confined to colonial Africa: What happens when a society faces transformation, and its leaders respond not with imagination, but with inflexibility?

The answer, suggested quietly but unmistakably, is that decline is rarely sudden. It begins in the refusal to bend, the insistence on a past that can no longer be recovered, and the elevation of strength over wisdom.

That is not only Okonkwo’s story. It is a warning.

If this essay mattered to you, future work from On Race in America is delivered directly by email.